High feed costs are hurting African poultry producers today, writes Sacau CEO Ishmael Sunga. He explains that with bold policy, patient finance and commercial farmer partnerships, they can become the launchpad for a new generation of youth-led maize, soya and feed enterprises.
Africa faces a choice. It can continue treating high poultry feed costs as an unavoidable burden on farmers and consumers, or it can turn that very crisis into one of the continent’s most practical youth employment and agribusiness opportunities.
The second option demands courage, coordination and a willingness to think differently about how food systems, finance and youth enterprise are connected.
Poultry is already one of the most accessible entry points into agriculture. It is faster to start than many livestock enterprises, serves a growing market for affordable protein, and creates opportunities in production, services, logistics, processing and retail.
Yet the industry is being strangled by one stubborn reality: feed is expensive, volatile and often unreliable. When yellow maize and soya prices rise, small and medium poultry producers feel the shock immediately. Margins shrink, expansion plans stall, and promising youth enterprises are pushed back into survival mode.
But buried inside this problem is a powerful market signal. If feed is the biggest cost driver in poultry, then reducing that cost is not only a technical issue; it is an enterprise opportunity.
Related stories
- Chicken farm guide: Tips on chicken feed
- Poultry value chains: Driving rural economic growth in SA
- SA poultry industry calls for urgent bird flu vaccine rollout
The enterprise opportunity behind soaring feed costs
Africa needs more locally produced yellow maize, more soya, stronger aggregation, better storage, more oilseed processing, more feed milling and smarter distribution systems. These are not abstract needs. They are business opportunities waiting to be organised, financed and placed in the hands of ambitious young agripreneurs.
The response should be bold: a targeted, massive drive to support youth-led small and medium-scale producers of yellow maize and soya, anchored in real markets and connected to existing commercial infrastructure.
Young people should not be invited into agriculture only through slogans, competitions and short training programmes. They need land access, inputs, mechanisation, irrigation, finance, storage, buyers, mentorship and predictable routes to market.
Building anchor partnerships with commercial farmers
This is where large-scale commercial farmers can play a decisive role. They should not be viewed merely as charitable mentors. They should be positioned as strategic anchor partners who can help build bankable youth producer clusters around real feed-market demand. They can provide land access arrangements, production planning, mechanisation, irrigation support, input procurement, drying, storage, quality control, market aggregation and technical supervision.
This is not a call for charity. It is a call for hard-headed commercial partnership. Large-scale commercial farmers already hold much of the infrastructure that young producers lack: machinery, irrigation, storage, technical systems, input networks, banking relationships and market knowledge.
If these assets are deliberately opened up through fair and structured partnerships, they can become a launchpad for youth-owned production rather than a barrier to entry.
Innovative agri-finance: Unlocking wholesale credit for youth
The real breakthrough would come when commercial farmers are enabled to serve as wholesale financing facilities for youth producers.
Many established farmers have stronger balance sheets, collateral, credit histories and relationships with banks. They can negotiate larger credit lines from commercial banks, development finance institutions and blended finance vehicles, then channel support to youth outgrowers through input packs, mechanisation services, crop establishment support, working capital advances and post-harvest services.
This would make agricultural finance more practical. Banks are often reluctant to lend to young producers individually because of limited collateral, thin credit histories and high transaction costs. But where youth producers are organised around credible anchor farmers, verified production plans, insurance, off-take agreements and repayment through produce delivery, lending becomes less speculative and more bankable.
The anchor farmer benefits from service income, better infrastructure utilisation and expanded supply. The young producer benefits from finance, inputs, skills and market access. The lender benefits from structure and oversight. Everyone has a reason to make the system work.
Bold fiscal and monetary incentives for systemic impact
For this to move from idea to impact, public policy must be unapologetically intentional. Governments, central banks, development finance institutions and private lenders should stop treating youth agribusiness as a marginal development project and start treating it as strategic economic infrastructure.
Fiscal incentives must reduce the cost of entry. Monetary support must make finance patient and affordable. Incentives for commercial farmers must reward those who genuinely bring youth producers into productive, fair and scalable value chains.
The fiscal package should be practical and targeted. Tax holidays or time-bound tax relief should be available to qualifying youth-led maize, soya, aggregation, oilseed processing and feed milling enterprises. VAT exemptions or rebates should apply to certified seed, fertiliser, lime, inoculants, irrigation equipment, storage equipment and feed-milling machinery. Duty-free or reduced-duty importation should be allowed for specialised equipment that can lower the cost of mechanisation, processing, drying and quality testing.
Accelerated depreciation allowances could encourage investment in irrigation, storage, renewable energy, mechanisation and processing assets. Investment tax credits could support youth-owned aggregation centres, grain storage, oilseed crushing facilities and feed formulation units.
Anchor commercial farmers who provide verified mentorship, mechanisation, storage, off-take and extension services to youth clusters should also receive tax deductions or credits for their role.
The monetary package must be equally deliberate. Dedicated youth agriculture financing windows should provide concessional interest rates, interest-rate buy-downs, seasonal production loans, grace periods aligned to crop cycles, working-capital facilities and longer repayment tenors for productive assets.
No serious agricultural finance system should demand repayment schedules that ignore the realities of land preparation, planting, input application, harvesting, drying, storage and sale.
Credit guarantees and risk-sharing facilities will be essential. Many young producers lack collateral and long credit histories, even when they have viable production opportunities. Partial credit guarantees, first-loss facilities, portfolio guarantees and insurance-linked lending can encourage banks to lend while protecting public resources from open-ended exposure. These instruments should be transparent, performance-based and independently monitored.
Warehouse receipt finance should also form part of the solution. Youth producers and aggregators should be able to deposit grain in certified warehouses, receive receipts and use those receipts as collateral for short-term credit. This would help them avoid distress sales immediately after harvest, improve price negotiation and strengthen formal commodity markets.
Commercial farmers also need a clear reason to participate at scale. Interest-rate rebates on wholesale facilities, partial credit guarantees for youth producer portfolios, tax deductions for verified support services, accelerated depreciation on inclusive-use assets, matching grants for shared irrigation and storage, and duty relief for specialised equipment should be part of the package. Performance bonuses should reward anchor farmers whose youth clusters deliver on production, repayment, quality and market commitments.
Non-financial incentives also matter. Approved anchor-partner status, preferential access to public-private partnership opportunities, participation in structured feed reserve procurement, technical assistance for outgrower management systems, digital traceability support and green-finance eligibility can all help make the model attractive to commercial farmers while strengthening accountability.
Safeguarding youth agency in an integrated feed economy
Of course, the model must be protected from capture and abuse. Youth producers must never become invisible labour hidden inside someone else’s balance sheet. They must remain recognisable economic actors with fair contracts, transparent deductions, timely payments, access to dispute resolution, measurable skills transfer and a pathway to building their own assets, credit histories and market relationships. Inclusion without economic agency is not empowerment.
The broader opportunity goes beyond crop production. Youth agripreneurs can build businesses in feed milling, aggregation of maize and soya, oilseed cake supply, alternative feed ingredients, digital feed advisory services, bulk procurement, last-mile distribution, quality testing and logistics.
In other words, the aim should not be only to produce more grain, but to build an integrated youth-led feed economy.
The prize is too important to ignore. If done well, this model can lower feed costs, stabilise feed supply, strengthen poultry enterprises, expand rural and peri-urban employment, deepen youth ownership in agricultural value chains and help make animal protein more affordable for consumers. It can create regional feed hubs, youth-led service networks and integrated poultry systems that connect feed, production, finance, health services and markets.
Africa has all the ingredients for this breakthrough:
- young people hungry for opportunity,
- rising demand for poultry products,
- commercial farmers with infrastructure and know-how,
- financial institutions searching for bankable agricultural models, and
- governments under pressure to create jobs and strengthen food security.
What is missing is not potential. What is missing is the policy courage to connect these assets into one purposeful programme.
The message is simple: do not waste the feed crisis. Use it.
Use it to build youth-owned maize and soya enterprises. Use it to bring commercial farmers into fair anchor partnerships. Use it to force innovation in agricultural finance. Use it to reduce the cost of poultry production and expand access to affordable protein.
With bold incentives, disciplined implementation and genuine partnership, today’s poultry feed crisis can become tomorrow’s youth agribusiness revolution.
- The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Food For Mzansi.
READ NEXT: Dragon fruit thrives in KZN valley despite tough national season
