The agricultural sector is marked by farmers’ daily struggles, including price hikes, climate change effects, and pest and disease outbreaks.
Prof Yonas T Bahta, associate professor and astute National Research Foundation (NRF) C2-rated researcher in the department of agriculture economics at the University of the Free State (UFS), found that smallholder farmers who received drought relief support saw an improvement in their welfare. The study also found that economic capital, social capital, human capital, and natural capital substantially affected the welfare of smallholder farmers.
Agricultural drought
These findings came from the study, titled: The Resilience of Households to Agricultural Drought in the Northern Cape Province of South Africa.
Bahta’s aim with this study was threefold: to assess household resilience to agricultural drought among smallholder livestock farmers, to evaluate the welfare of smallholder farming households affected by agricultural drought, and to identify factors influencing agricultural drought resilience and food insecurity among smallholder livestock farmers.
During his investigation, he found that only 9% of the smallholder livestock farmers were resilient to agricultural drought.
According to him, farming households with access to credit, farmers who received assistance from the government (such as training and feed) during drought, and farmers who are part of a cooperative proved to be more resilient to agricultural drought.
Bouncing back is crucial
When it comes to food security, he discovered that assets, social safety nets, and indicators of adaptive capacity had a positive influence on households’ ability to withstand food insecurity. Alternatively, climate change indicators negatively impacted households’ resilience to food insecurity.
For the past three years, he has studied the resilience of smallholder livestock farmers in agricultural drought. He believes that resilience – the ability to bounce back from adversities – is crucial.
According to him, both the smallholder livestock sector (farmers) and the agrifood industry need to develop resilience to effectively cope with and recover from agricultural drought, macroeconomic stability (inflation), competitiveness, productivity, and other related factors.
Competitiveness of agri-food commodities
Bahta also launched investigations into the competitiveness of agri-food commodities in South Africa as well as Namibia.
The studies were titled: Competitiveness of Namibia’s Agrifood Commodities: Implications for Food Security and Competitiveness of South Africa’s Agrifood Commodities.
In these studies, he respectively looked at the competitiveness of South Africa’s and Namibia’s agrifood products, the factors that influence it, and its implication for food security.
In both countries, he discovered a combination of comparative advantages and disadvantages.
“South Africa and Namibia exhibited a trade structure that was less concentrated and not dependant on international trade in the agri-food industry, having minimal impact on Namibia’s food security.
“The productivity of agriculture and GDP per capita positively influenced the comparative advantage of South Africa, whereas land productivity and GDP per capita influenced the degree of food insecurity in Namibia,” explains Bahta.
Research outputs
The study on the resilience of smallholder livestock farmers was supported by funding from the National Research Foundation. To explore the competitiveness of agri-food commodities, Bahta collaborated with the Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST), benefiting from their strong existing academic relationship.
The UFS Office for International Affaris played a key role in facilitating this study, with research partnerships existing between the universities of both countries.
According to Bahta, the findings of these two studies have resulted in the publication of more than 13 articles in journals ranking in the highest (Q1) and second highest categories (Q2) in the specific field.
Furthermore, five popular articles on the main findings of the studies (written in non-technical language) were also published on these topics, focusing on the farmers and policy makers (as a policy brief and popular) as the target audience.
These articles looked at, among others, the impact of policy intervention on food insecurity in times of shock; coping strategies of smallholder livestock farmers during food insecurity shocks; measuring the resilience of female smallholders in South Africa; and farming for success.
This study also resulted in the graduation of three master’s students (two with distinction) and three honours students.
Looking ahead, Bahta emphasises the necessity for conducting similar studies targeting both commercial and smallholder farmers, focusing on crops and livestock in various provinces across South Africa. He also feels that connections need to be established with universities besides NUST.
ALSO READ: Climate change: Who should foot the bill to fix it?
Sign up for Mzansi Today: Your daily take on the news and happenings from the agriculture value chain.
