Farmers should be better prepared if they want to see their applications for water use licenses approved within 90 days. This is the view of SRK Consulting environmental scientist Megan Kim Govender.
This, after the department of water and sanitation (DWS) implemented a plan to reduce the turnaround of such applications from 300 days, to just 90. This plan has been in action since 1 April, and all those license applications submitted before then will still undergo the 300-day process.
This step is to be applauded, says Govender.
“By speeding up the process, it is hoped that applications can be adjudicated faster, and licences issued more quickly – allowing developers to initiate projects sooner,” she says.
FARMER POLL
📢 Which bank is powering your farming journey?
Tell us which bank you use so we can better advocate for the specialised financial tools and accessible capital needed to help South African farmers overcome growth barriers and thrive!
All submissions are kept strictly confidential.
“However, more detailed studies and preparation must be conducted upfront to ensure a complete submission that meets all DWS requirements.”
Take care with submissions
Govender warns that the new system may give DWS case officers less time to request information that might be unclear, incomplete or missing from the submission – in which case the whole application may be rejected. This may send applicants back to the drawing board and delay their projects.
“There will be no opportunity for the applicant to submit any missing information or refine details during the 90 days,” agrees Jacky Burke, principal scientist at SRK Consulting. “Applications must contain all the necessary specialist information, design requirements and supporting information first time around.”
WULA submissions must now include detailed engineering specifications, in accordance with the DWS’s technical advisory notes.
This is in line with global practice, which is moving toward closer integration of engineering aspects with environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues and financial sustainability in all projects.
Govender notes that the pre-application phase of the WULA will include a pre-application meeting with the DWS case officer, meetings with the DWS sub-directorates (for in-stream water uses and engineering designs), site visits, technical report compilation and the completion of the necessary departmental forms.
ALSO READ: Tips for farmers who want to manage water risks
Pre-submission meeting
“Once the full WULA – including supporting information – is submitted, the clock will start ticking and DWS will have 90 days to assess the application,” she said. “It will be important for applicants to cover all the bases to reduce the chance of rejection.”
She recommends that, in addition to the regulated pre-application meeting with DWS, applicants should also request a pre-submission meeting to check that there are no obvious gaps or shortcomings in their documentation. Certain DWS offices already conducted such meetings.
“One of the changes that the new system brings is that applicants will now generally have to advance their projects to feasibility stage – rather than pre-feasibility – before their WULA submissions can comply with the levels of detail required by the department,” she says.
“Nonetheless, it is wise to engage knowledgeable consultants, with experience in the application process, at an early stage in the project life-cycle.”
ALSO READ: Water resources: Restorative justice under threat
